<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="zh-CN">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group><journal-title>当代教育论丛</journal-title></journal-title-group>
      <issn>3136-2257</issn>
      <publisher><publisher-name>求真学术出版</publisher-name></publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">0cffee81-544f-46d6-9ab3-a2a4de24273a</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.68249/cece.2026.0012</article-id>
      <elocation-id>0012</elocation-id>
      <title-group><article-title>教育数字化背景下GenAI融入翻译伦理的解构与重构</article-title></title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>李晨子晗</surname></name><aff>黑龙江工程学院艺术与设计学院</aff></contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic"><year>2026</year><month>8</month><day>29</day></pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>18</fpage><lpage>26</lpage>
      <abstract><p>在教育数字化转型的战略背景下，生成式人工智能（GenAI）正深刻改变翻译行业的技术生态与伦理景观，对传统翻译伦理研究模式和高校教学育人工作构成根本性挑战。GenAI对传统翻译伦理的“解构”效应表现为翻译主体由人类译者独立主导走向人智协同的多元格局，伦理客体从待译文本延伸至训练数据与模型算法，伦理关系经历人际关系的重塑与人智关系的兴起，伦理价值则由单一忠实性转向多维可信性、由个体责任转向集体责任。因此，GenAI时代翻译伦理重构的核心原则是人本性、透明性、责任性与公平性，应从规范引导、技术创新、伦理教育和生态发展四个层面具体重构。</p></abstract>
      <kwd-group><kwd>教育数字化</kwd><kwd>生成式人工智能</kwd><kwd>翻译伦理</kwd><kwd>人智协同</kwd></kwd-group>
      <permissions><license><license-p>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</license-p></license></permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://www.qiuzhenpress.com/articles/cece-2026-0012" />
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="R1"><mixed-citation>[1]Dalayli F.Generative AI in Translation:Opportunities and Challenges[J].Journal of Translation Studies,2023,4(2):45-62.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R2"><mixed-citation>[2]Manakhimova S.,et al.Evaluating Generative AI for Professional Translation:A Comparative Study[J].Machine Translation,2023,37(3):289-312.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R3"><mixed-citation>[3]王华树,刘世界.从MTPE到AIPE:GenAI时代翻译模式演变及其对翻译教育的启示[J].山东外语教学,2025,46(3):110-121.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R4"><mixed-citation>[4]Moorkens J.Ethics and Machine Translation[A].In D. Kenny (ed.), Machine Translation for Everyone: Empowering Users in the Age of Artificial Intelligence[C].Berlin: Language Science Press,2022:121-140.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R5"><mixed-citation>[5]Schleiermacher F.On the Different Methods of Translating[A].In L. Venuti (ed.),The Translation Studies Reader[C].London:Routledge,2021:43-63.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R6"><mixed-citation>[6]Lawrence V.The Translator&apos;s Invisibility:A History of Translation[M].Taylor and Francis.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R7"><mixed-citation>[7]Nida E A.Toward a Science of Translating[M].Leiden:Brill,1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R8"><mixed-citation>[8]Chesterman.Proposal for a Hieronymic Oath[J].The Translator,2001,7(2):139-154.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R9"><mixed-citation>[9]Nord C.Translating as a Purposeful Activity:Functionalist Approaches Explained[M].Taylor &amp; Francis.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R10"><mixed-citation>[10]Drugan,Tipton.Translation,ethics and social responsibility[J].The Translator,2017,23(2):119-125.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R11"><mixed-citation>[11]ITI.Code of Professional Conduct[S].London:Institute of Translation and Interpreting,2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R12"><mixed-citation>[12]Munday J.Translation and Ideology:A Critical Discourse Analysis of Chávez&apos;s Speeches[J].The Translator,2007,13(2):195-218.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R13"><mixed-citation>[13]Pym A.Text and Risk in Translation[A].In M. Sidiropoulou &amp; A. Papaconstantinou (eds.), Choice and Difference in Translation[C].Athens:University of Athens,2005:27-42.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R14"><mixed-citation>[14]Greenall,Annjo K.,Alvstad,Cecilia,Jansen,Hanne,et al.Introduction:voice,ethics and translation[J].PERSPECTIVES-STUDIES IN TRANSLATION THEORY AND PRACTICE,2019,27(5):639-647.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R15"><mixed-citation>[15]Toury G.The Nature and Role of Norms in Translation[A].In L. Venuti (ed.),The Translation Studies Reader[C].London:Routledge,2021:197-210.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R16"><mixed-citation>[16]Andrew C.Memes of Translation:The spread of ideas in translation theory.strongRevised edition/strong[M].John Benjamins Publishing Company.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R17"><mixed-citation>[17]Wu Y., et al.TransAgents:Multi-Agent Translation of Literary Texts[J/OL].arXiv preprint,2024,arXiv:2405.12345.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R18"><mixed-citation>[18]王华树,刘世界.大数据时代翻译数据伦理研究:概念、问题与建议[J].上海翻译,2022,(2):12-17.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R19"><mixed-citation>[19]生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法[J].中华人民共和国国务院公报,2023,(24):39-42.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R20"><mixed-citation>[20]中国翻译协会翻译技术专业委员会.翻译行业生成式人工智能应用指南(2025)[S].2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="R21"><mixed-citation>[21]Yang Z.,et al.Human-in-the-Loop Machine Translation:A Survey[J].Computational Linguistics,2023,49(4):823-870.</mixed-citation></ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
