The portal is for journal discovery, policy review, and routing into submission. Formal submission, file upload, review notices, and acceptance communications are handled in the OJS subsite. Authors should treat the OJS status, timestamps, and mail notices as the operational source of truth.
Review timelines vary with discipline, manuscript complexity, reviewer availability, and revision rounds. The first-decision timeline shown on journal pages is a reference only, and editors may request supplementary files, formatting fixes, or updated disclosure statements when needed.
Initial Screening
After submission, the editorial office first checks whether the files are complete, the required information is present, and the manuscript fits the journal's scope and editorial direction. Manuscripts that do not meet baseline requirements are usually returned promptly with an explanation.
Format Review and Content Assessment
The editorial office reviews formatting details such as font use, type size, and heading structure, and then evaluates the manuscript's scholarly value, originality, and relevance. When a submission does not meet the standard, authors are normally informed within one week and given specific suggestions for improvement.
Double-Blind Peer Review
Submissions that pass screening enter a double-blind review process to protect author and reviewer privacy and support fair, objective evaluation. Standard manuscripts are typically reviewed by one to three experts, while interdisciplinary or more contested submissions may be assigned to three or four reviewers.
Revision Notices and Editorial Decisions
Based on the review reports, the editorial office decides whether to accept, decline, or request revision and provides concrete, actionable revision guidance. Authors should rely on the status, timestamps, and email notices issued through OJS.